oh and maybe petra... well... i might care for her, but i care a lot better for the twins

Moderators: Moderators, Admin
Geno,Geno wrote:
Understand this too this Max, and don't, find it offensive, but in order to solve this problem, I am not intested in what you think about Mr. Elsullo intentions. I want to see it with my own eyes from him, Max. In spite of Bluestone's insenstivity, I have just put that member under a great deal of presure to come clean for what he said.
Of course you weren't worried about it, Geno, because I'm sure you're smart enough to understand exactly what I meant. I let you speak your mind on this board, and you're one of the most outspoken members here. So, I used you as an example, i.e. if I was going to ban someone for speaking their mind, it would be someone who is outspoken... but I'm NOT going to ban someone just because they speak their mind. That's what I meant, and you know it, my friend. If you take a comment like that as a veiled threat, how can I continue to joke around with you? You must learn to lighten up, Eugene. I'm not out to get you! By the way, just ignore that guy who's following you home at night. No, that's not an AK47 tucked under his trench coat. I'm sure he's just a harmless DS fan who wants your autographGeno wrote:
As far a banning I was not refering to the shootingmad incident I was refering to another post in which you introduced that subtle indication of banning right here below.....
" I would think that if I was going to ban anyone for free speech, it would be Geno"--- written by Bluestone on thread "Free Speech??".
That where I got that from, not from the shootingmad post. It ok I did not see that a a real problem and I was not worried about it either.
Elsullo could lead a jackass through the eye of a needle without the beast knowing it. I could only wish to be that clever with a simple thread.Geno wrote:
Max5s--- You were right again, Elsullo is more clever and witty than I thought,
Users browsing this forum: Awol Nate, tommisanta and 27 guests