Page 2 of 3

Re: Clothes or No Clothes?

Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 1:07 am
by Nightposter
I vote for clothing every time. Stripping after the deed is OK. As to what kind of clothing,
I prefer my victims to dress smart. Clothing that fits, suits, shirts and skirts, uniforms.
As some of you know, I'm really into women in uniform.

Yes shiny, slinky form fitting dresses have their place too. I just don't want the actresses looking like street hookers or sluts when they are supposed to be a secretary in an office situation where the outfit would never be allowed. Now if she is playing a call girl, that would be fine.

I also prefer that clothing remain on for the majority of the scene, I don't like the get naked in the first 1/4 of any scene, unless it is for something like a shower or sex. ;-)

BTW-
My first post here, I tend to lurk a lot. Good luck here!

Re: Clothes or No Clothes?

Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 1:11 pm
by Alex
Of course clothed ...fully clothed tight skirt and blouse ..maybe summerdress or sexy dresses like those of silk ...nightgowns (white or light coloured) ..even shoes

Re: Clothes or No Clothes?

Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 6:29 pm
by JIMBO
[In Re: G-Man's full-figured babes in old style lingerie....

TWO CAN PLAY AT THAT GAME! ;) (see pic)

Image

As for the "nude or not" question, I'm pretty fickle: If I don't like the clothes or they are not "right" for the scene, she is better off naked. Plus, nudity implies vulnerability... perhaps she is naked for sex, or a bath... she has let down her guards and even a deadly bad girl can be "had" at such a time. :twisted:

Jimbo

P.S.: BRAVO to the direct picture posting! ImageShack go to H E L L! :lol:

Re: Clothes or No Clothes?

Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 7:52 pm
by snipergeezer
i prefer clothes on too, although a few undone teasing buttons are great, treacherous secretary is one of my favourites,.
Its quite odd really that there are more images of naked women on the internet than women in flimsy blouses , I only found a few and they aint that good. I am trying photomanips, and its hard finding the best images to play with, some good stuff in a place called billsplayhouse.
good luck with the new site http://groups.yahoo.com/group/billsplayhouse/ i hope this link is ok

Re: Clothes or No Clothes?

Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 9:58 pm
by Bluestone
The link is fine with me! Feel free to share here, guys. It's your playground! Just play nice :)

By the way, I started this topic, because I find that clothes often make the scene. You'll see what I mean when G-Man reviews Suzi's "Late Date" video at FF. Clothes, like make-up, enhance a woman's look. Hot girls look hotter in lingerie. Sexy women look sexier in short skirts or tight tops or both. Well, at least that's my opinion for what it's worth :D

Re: Clothes or No Clothes?

Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 2:36 pm
by hank
I agree with Blue. For me, the clothes do make the scene. Whatever our specific clothing preferences, the clothing creates anticipation. What is the present inside the wrapping?

Re: Clothes or No Clothes?

Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 1:21 pm
by kolchak
I like it when the lady wears boots and a turtleneck in a scene where she is strangled with a rope or hung.

Re: Clothes or No Clothes?

Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 7:13 pm
by Indrid Cold
My favorite attire is for the victim is the short skirt bussiness suit look, like in this example: http://eliseerotic.com/vidsamples/p01010522.jpg

I'm also partial to bikinis, certain types of fetish wear (such as fantasy warrior costumes and dominatrix gear), really anything that showcases a woman's legs and/or cleavage. To be honest, I'm just not all that attracted to a completely naked body.

Re: Clothes or No Clothes?

Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 12:28 pm
by gold
The silk look is great that is used by Blue ,but a lingering totally scantly clothed woman is probably the lure that brought about her demise.Will vote 8o% no and 20% yes for those models who prefer it that way. It basically goes down to the story cost and directors preference.

Re: Clothes or No Clothes?

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 4:31 pm
by snipergeezer
That link i posted earlier no longer exists,I think thought police have struck again, would say i have shot myself in the foot , but someone might get off on that sort of thing :shock: so will be careful in future what i post .

Re: Clothes or No Clothes?

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 8:42 pm
by Bluestone
Hi Snipergeezer,

Not sure what link you're referring to. I've checked with Grim Reaper, and nothing on this thread has been deleted by the administration. There are no thought police here... that's in the U.K. :)

There are guidelines, which we had to recently enforce in the video share forum, but free speech is respected and encouraged on this board!

Blue

Re: Clothes or No Clothes?

Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 2:20 pm
by snipergeezer
8-) Was not saying you guys deleted it , it was UK thought police they are lurking about (rapid eye movement) and they shut down the group i posted a link toohttp://groups.yahoo.com/group/billsplayhouse/ this one.

Re: Clothes or No Clothes?

Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 8:12 pm
by Bluestone
Okay. Now I understand. Yes, those thought police are everywhere. Isn't it strange that they used to only exist in Science Fiction novels, but now we're living in a Big Brother world? Scary.

By the way, although I still prefer my women clothed, I've just posted a nude death scene at Silk Videos. Gotta satisfy all of the tastes out there :D

Blue

Re: Clothes or No Clothes?

Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2008 7:33 pm
by KelseyKinsley
I am torn between two things like many others that posted. Nude is better to see the woman and see the injuries and to also see how the blood flows over her skin. But clothing become bloodstained is cool too.

Re: Clothes or No Clothes?

Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 2:04 am
by hucklebury
Much more exciting in sexy clothes. Tight dress/skirt, clingy blouse, lacy lingerie, heels too. These things only add to the feminine beauty. In my humble opinion.
Like this possible victim. Or this lovely little killer.