Femme Fatalities Message Board

Bluestone wrote:Well, I can say that my Suzi pussy shooting is a far classier one than the graphic porn-style ones referred to above and on DS. It's not unlike a lower belly shooting. I'm wondering if belly-shooting fans have an interest.

Blue

I'm very much into belly-shooting, but the only hole I like the bullet to enter is the belly button. Pussy-shooting has no attraction for me.

Here's a Pussy who shoots back.

Hey Blue!

Cant wait to see this one!

Please show us some stills of the preamble or of Velvets of firing at Suzi!

Thanks a bunch!

alicia2004 wrote:Hey Blue!

Cant wait to see this one!

Please show us some stills of the preamble or of Velvets of firing at Suzi!

Thanks a bunch!

I'm on a 3 day Kerie-Lena shoot right now. I'll get some pics up when I get home.

Blue

Great! Thanks blue!

Also, is Kerie going to 'shoot' the lovely Lena in the latest shoot?

alicia2004 wrote:Great! Thanks blue!

Also, is Kerie going to 'shoot' the lovely Lena in the latest shoot?

Yes, indeed. We're hoping to shoot 12 videos, and one involves Kerie shooting Lena twice under the table. Not a pussy shooting, but two stomach shots. Then, Kerie lifts the gun above the table and shoots Lena in the chest.

Blue

Blue,
From the pics shown -- I am not sure I would call this a pussy shooting - but in the general area (lower belly) for sure and the intent is there. Variety is what the venue needs and this ads to it.
What I imagine as erotic (personal opinion only) are the breast shots that you generally do and then the final shot - a kill shot so to speak "cumming" right between her legs when she is down -- directly into her exposed silky satiny panties. The requisite spasms and twitching of her body and legs and she is gone !
A little strong for a Bluestone production, but certainly not for your competition.

taurusjds wrote:Blue,
From the pics shown -- I am not sure I would call this a pussy shooting - but in the general area (lower belly) for sure and the intent is there. Variety is what the venue needs and this ads to it.
What I imagine as erotic (personal opinion only) are the breast shots that you generally do and then the final shot - a kill shot so to speak "cumming" right between her legs when she is down -- directly into her exposed silky satiny panties. The requisite spasms and twitching of her body and legs and she is gone !
A little strong for a Bluestone production, but certainly not for your competition.

I know that they are not direct hits, but Geno, apparently the self-proclaimed pussy-shooting expert, says that it qualifies as a pussy shooting if it's in that general area. I know, different strokes for different folks. Just thought I'd do something a little different for lower belly and pussy shooting fans, without the usual breast hits. There is a wide range of tastes in this community, so we'll see if this one pushes the right buttons for a segment of our population... or not.

Competition? I've got competition? I thought those guys were just my fellow producers who I raise brews with at the Hemlock bar. Hmmm. I'd better keep one eye open when I pass out from intoxication in the future.

Blue

I am of the opinion that that regardless of how classy the production of "The Widowmaker" is it treads on a subject that I think is unhealthy for the long-term health of this community. With the regular inclusion of pornographic content in many videos produced in this community, we are already holding a bigger and more conductive lightning rod than in the "old days", and all it will take is an American Jane Longhurst to finish what VISA and MasterCard have already done to our fellow viewers.

I want to say that I really dislike censorship, but I think there is a need to be cognizant of what happened in the UK and to realize that it could also happen here.

Max,I have to agree with you. Also, the growing emphasis on porn and such yucky things as pussy shots affects the health of the community in another way, it drives the females away.

You make a very good point, Lady Ash. Pussy shots are suggestive of an embracing of genital mutilation which is generally seen as horrific. I'm sure it does drive female members away. Hell, it drives me away.

Being part of an organization that was nearly destroyed by what happened in the UK, I see a good reason to be cautious. You have at least one producer in Canada who suffered even more. History provides valuable lessons. Personally, I have a huge distaste for censorship in most cases, but I'd hate to see the community go down the drain because producers elect to "push the boundries" in ways that are going to portray us in an even more negative light. And if Liz is correct (and I think she is), why do we need to produce material that is going to drive away what few women participants we have?